Earticle

초록

영어

The facts of car sales fraud cases are different, and the role of details in the identification of fraud cannot be ignored. Whether the operator constitutes fraud as he fails to fulfill his statutory obligation to inform consumers and violates consumers’ right to know or not, it is necessary to explore the relationship between these two. The judgment of this case provides a principled path for the future trial of similar cases: while judging whether the operator violates the statutory disclosure obligation constitutes fraud in the Consumer Protection Law should Focus on the following factors: whether it affects the fundamental purpose of consumer contracting, and whether there is a subjective intention to conceal relevant information. It has guiding significances for promoting the reasonable protection of automobile consumers’ right to know and the orderly development of the automobile industry.

중국어

汽车销售欺诈的案件事实细节不一，而细节因素在欺诈的认定上所产生的作用是无法忽视 的。经营者因不履行法定告知义务而侵犯消费者知情权，其是否构成欺诈，需要在这两者的关 系上进行探讨。本案的判决为日后类案的审理提供了原则性路径：经营者违反法定告知义务是 否构成《消费者权益保护法》中的欺诈应着重考虑如下因素，即是否影响到消费者缔约根本目 的，以及是否存在隐瞒相关信息的主观故意。本案对于促进汽车消费者知情权的合理保护以及 汽车行业的有序发展具有指导意义。

목차

摘要
引言
一、案例梳理
二、案例评析
三、结语
參考文獻
ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 杨诗炜 [ YANG SHIWEI | 上海大学法学院东亚比较法研究中心 研究员。 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340